Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 55

Thread: Suggest an SSD

  1. #31
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    7,407
    Thanks
    692
    Thanked 1,314 Times in 913 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    my mistake I assume you had the 256GB version.


    still sticking with the M4 tho been tried and tested

  2. #32
    Do you want to play...? Mr. Grapes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    fareham
    Posts
    3,824
    Thanks
    452
    Thanked 357 Times in 297 Posts
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    have a look at this thread
    http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread....A343-07-INC!!!

    clarification... it's not as high end as the M4, but look at those prices!
    http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/storag...-120gb/?page=8
    Last edited by Mr. Grapes; 09-05-12 at 11:17.
    Orange San Francisco: member #1
    XBMC 11 eden now available. get it here: http://mirrors.xbmc.org/releases/
    BLACK 'n' BLUE: X3360:: P5Q-E::4GB Ballistix::2x6850::Zalman GS1000 Plus case
    Kitchen: E2140@2.0::GA-G31M S2L::2GB Geil::Low Profile GF210

  3. #33
    Bezza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    456
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Someone should really set up a sticky that helps decide on which SSD is best. Something that references driver performance and known problems, real world benchmarks rather than quoted rates, reliability etc etc. Despite people saying the M4 is the best (and I have one and can't fault it), it's hard to understand the exact reason for this without seeing some side-by-side data.
    i7 3770K @ 4.1Ghz (to overclock more) ¦ Noctua NH-D14 Cooler ¦ Asus Sabertooth Z77 ¦ 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP @ 1600Mhz ¦ KFA2 670 OC 4GB ¦ 2 x 256GB & 1 x 64GB Crucial M4 SSD ¦ Corsair TX 850w ¦ Antec P182 ¦ W7 Professional 64 ¦ 27" Yamakasi Catleap 2560 x 1440 ¦ Asus Xonar DX ¦ Alesis M1 Active 520

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bezza For This Useful Post:


  5. #34
    Joshimitsu91's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    321
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bezza View Post
    Someone should really set up a sticky that helps decide on which SSD is best. Something that references driver performance and known problems, real world benchmarks rather than quoted rates, reliability etc etc. Despite people saying the M4 is the best (and I have one and can't fault it), it's hard to understand the exact reason for this without seeing some side-by-side data.
    I agree. What are people's thoughts on the SanDisk Extreme 120GB SSD?
    i5 2500k | 8GB Corsair Vengeance | XFX HD 7970 DD Black Edition 3GB | 120GB Mushkin Chronos SSD | 1TB Spinpoint F3 | 3TB Seagate Barracuda

  6. #35
    SCARY !!! I3R0K3N7FEET's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    8,087
    Thanks
    1,894
    Thanked 860 Times in 620 Posts
    Rep Power
    2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshimitsu91 View Post
    I agree. What are people's thoughts on the SanDisk Extreme 120GB SSD?
    its meant to be a good ssd but unproven compared to some trusted brands so any issues may not have been discovered yet.

    sandisk are a reputable brand in regards to memory though so could be worth the try


  7. #36
    dunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    235
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    According to Micro Mart, the SSD with the highest level of performance and consistency is the Corsair Performance Series Pro; £140 for 128GB is also pretty palatable.

    http://www.corsair.com/ssd/performan...ard-drive.html
    {Insert witty comment here}

  8. #37
    Traldera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Cardiff
    Posts
    2,049
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 188 Times in 156 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dunc View Post
    According to Micro Mart, the SSD with the highest level of performance and consistency is the Corsair Performance Series Pro; £140 for 128GB is also pretty palatable.

    http://www.corsair.com/ssd/performan...ard-drive.html
    Thats a 50% price increase over a lot of brands.....not so palatable.....in fact its more akin to my mums cooking....

  9. #38
    dunc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    North London
    Posts
    235
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    meh, I'd pay a premium for performance......(and make sure your mum doesn't see that!)
    {Insert witty comment here}

  10. #39

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    S.Wales
    Posts
    1,162
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 81 Times in 74 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Again its all about needs, i have a OCZ, only sata 2, loads window up fast enough for me, tho i am in the market for a bigger one, have also thought about using it for cache drive, anybody ever tried that? and is it as good as they make it out to be?
    Next Phantom 820 Case - Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3P Intel Z68 - i5 2500k - H70 with 2 x Noctua FN120mm Fans -GPU WANTED - 8GB ripjaws 1600 - M4 128GB SSD - 500GB
    ASUS Xonor DX2 - Sennheiser px360 - Edifier R1600T Studio Plus 2.0 Monitors - AX860 Fully Modular 80 PLUS Platinum 860W - Dell Ultrasharp U2412M 24 inch IPS G510 - G13 - G500

  11. #40
    PC Guru dirtylarryuk's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    1,344
    Thanks
    64
    Thanked 140 Times in 121 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Games use M4 some apps prefer sandforce.

    Added after 3 minutes:

    Quote Originally Posted by TAZ007 View Post
    Again its all about needs, i have a OCZ, only sata 2, loads window up fast enough for me, tho i am in the market for a bigger one, have also thought about using it for cache drive, anybody ever tried that? and is it as good as they make it out to be?
    Cache thing works but to be honest nab a 120-256 for size then just transfer stuff to storage to a HDD even external and geta HDD out of the system. No HDD less noise less spin up seek time issues lagging the system. Cache thing was handy when SSD's were £3-4 a GB now they are less than £1 just try and fit the workload onto the SSD. |By workload I mean apps that need SSD and games that stream data and the OS.
    Last edited by dirtylarryuk; 14-05-12 at 22:57.

    GAMES 3D: i7 2600k 4.9Ghz, P67, FT02 SE, Gigabyte Titan, 4GB DDR3, 256GB M4
    OCZ Revo 2 x2 PCIE SSD 240 GB, G930 7.1. DISPLAYS: 2D 27" IPS 60Hz Dell 1440p 6ms U2711 - 120"
    21:9 100Hz DLP 0.1ms, 29" Dell IPS 60Hz 29" 21:9

  12. #41

    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    S.Wales
    Posts
    1,162
    Thanks
    90
    Thanked 81 Times in 74 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dirtylarryuk View Post
    Cache thing works but to be honest nab a 120-256 for size then just transfer stuff to storage to a HDD even external and geta HDD out of the system. No HDD less noise less spin up seek time issues lagging the system. Cache thing was handy when SSD's were £3-4 a GB now they are less than £1 just try and fit the workload onto the SSD. |By workload I mean apps that need SSD and games that stream data and the OS.

    Well tbh, my 60 is as good as full, as about 12 gig spare but dont seem enough for some games, not that i play many, but yes cud do with a bigger sdd just to keep my games on, will having OS on a sata 2 sdd cause any probs if i get a sata 3 sdd for my games? speed wise im not to bothered, i have a slow read and write with this one i have now, but it seems to get me into BF3 before most, dont understand anything beyond that tbh, or would i be better off using the sata 3 sdd for my os and some games and using the sata 2 sdd for back up etc, i have a 500 gig hdd now which i save everything on, but i install some games from there now and all bench mark programs , not sure the best way forward on this tbh thats where you guys come in handy
    Next Phantom 820 Case - Gigabyte GA-Z68X-UD3P Intel Z68 - i5 2500k - H70 with 2 x Noctua FN120mm Fans -GPU WANTED - 8GB ripjaws 1600 - M4 128GB SSD - 500GB
    ASUS Xonor DX2 - Sennheiser px360 - Edifier R1600T Studio Plus 2.0 Monitors - AX860 Fully Modular 80 PLUS Platinum 860W - Dell Ultrasharp U2412M 24 inch IPS G510 - G13 - G500

  13. #42
    Bezza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    456
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    With SSD prices what they are, seems grabbing 2 x 256GB versions and putting them in a RAID1 array is a pretty solid idea. Use one drive for OS and another for games. At least that's my plan although I may wait for the price to drop below £150.
    i7 3770K @ 4.1Ghz (to overclock more) ¦ Noctua NH-D14 Cooler ¦ Asus Sabertooth Z77 ¦ 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP @ 1600Mhz ¦ KFA2 670 OC 4GB ¦ 2 x 256GB & 1 x 64GB Crucial M4 SSD ¦ Corsair TX 850w ¦ Antec P182 ¦ W7 Professional 64 ¦ 27" Yamakasi Catleap 2560 x 1440 ¦ Asus Xonar DX ¦ Alesis M1 Active 520

  14. #43
    DB006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    356
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 45 Times in 33 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bezza View Post
    With SSD prices what they are, seems grabbing 2 x 256GB versions and putting them in a RAID1 array is a pretty solid idea. Use one drive for OS and another for games. At least that's my plan although I may wait for the price to drop below £150.
    The new Vertex 4 is faster than the M4, uses the same controller, but as it's new prices are still high.

  15. #44
    Bezza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    456
    Thanks
    41
    Thanked 46 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    1

    Default

    There'll always be something a bit better for a bit more. That's technology. However, in a real world test, the M4 is perfectly fast enough and not sure the speeds quoted on the newer drives will make that much real world difference - I mean who cares about 9 secs to boot vs 10 secs - much better than the previous 45 secs! Besides, there's only so much waiting that can be done though and you have to make a decision to buy at some point! I need a Sata3 board before worrying about this kind of stuff though.
    i7 3770K @ 4.1Ghz (to overclock more) ¦ Noctua NH-D14 Cooler ¦ Asus Sabertooth Z77 ¦ 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP @ 1600Mhz ¦ KFA2 670 OC 4GB ¦ 2 x 256GB & 1 x 64GB Crucial M4 SSD ¦ Corsair TX 850w ¦ Antec P182 ¦ W7 Professional 64 ¦ 27" Yamakasi Catleap 2560 x 1440 ¦ Asus Xonar DX ¦ Alesis M1 Active 520

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bezza For This Useful Post:


  17. #45
    DB006's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    356
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 45 Times in 33 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bezza View Post
    There'll always be something a bit better for a bit more. That's technology. However, in a real world test, the M4 is perfectly fast enough and not sure the speeds quoted on the newer drives will make that much real world difference - I mean who cares about 9 secs to boot vs 10 secs - much better than the previous 45 secs! Besides, there's only so much waiting that can be done though and you have to make a decision to buy at some point! I need a Sata3 board before worrying about this kind of stuff though.
    Agree 100%

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •