too good to be true or was they sand bagging?

[marsey99]

http://reviewage.co.uk/content/view/33/1/

it would be nice news to hold on to if you knew your 2 biggest competitors were about to do a big deal.

i mean 4ghz stock is bigger news than sli on intle boards :mrgreen:

[wonderlust]

Saw this a couple of days ago on Toms,

If it had been broken by a known site, I may have believed it, Although from the consumers point of view I hope that it is ture

[mac124]

If it is true things might be getting interesting.....

[coiler]

be nice if it was true, but the site looks a bit unscrupulous :P

[Monkey]

I hope this is true, Time for AMD to rule again, and then in 5 years intel, then another five years AMD will be almost broke again :P

[marsey99]

i saw the inital cpuz shot a few days back too but now foxcon is readying a board suppporting a phenom fx too?

coincidence? just wondered what you think.

[Monkey]

I hope they do start getting there asses in gear,

Who votes AMD to rule again? :P

[Aaron]

It'd be great if they did give intel some proper competition. I just hope they price it wisely. The first lot of FX's were SO expensive - they all have been actually! But if they price this right, it could be great :)

[Lynx]

They would need like 200w and some seriously good cooling.

[Audigex]

"There's said to be two chips in the pipeline, the FX-80 at 4Ghz and the FX-82 at 4.4GHz.
The FX-80 at stock out performs a 5.0GHz Kentsfield"

Last sentance isn't bad, imagine overclocking the FX-82 then?

And in theory, wouldn't that make the whole CPU equivalent to a 20ghz kentsfield? (In an ideal world)

[wonderlust]

so it will beat the Kentsfield... So does Yorkfield!

why are they aiming to beat intel's 65nm quad?

[Monkey]

I think they were tea bagging each other :P