PDA

View Full Version : Hackers turn back the clock with Telnet attacks



Ice Tea
28-01-11, 06:39
Hackers turn back the clock with Telnet attacks

The 40-year old protocol is increasingly being used by hackers, according to Akamai

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2011/012711-hackers-turn-back-the-clock.html

A new report from Akamai Technologies shows that hackers appear to be increasingly using the Telnet remote access protocol to attack corporate servers over mobile networks.

Akamai, which specializes in managing content and Web traffic, issues quarterly reports on Internet traffic trends. The latest report, which covers the third quarter of 2010, shows that 10 percent of attacks that came from mobile networks are directed at Port 23, which Telnet uses. That marks a somewhat unusual spike for the aging protocol.

12 "White Hat" hackers you should know

Telnet is a remote access tool used to log into remote servers, but it has been gradually replaced by SSH, also known as Secure Shell. Administrators are generally advised to disable Telnet if the protocol is not used to prevent attacks targeting it, but some forget.

Although those attacks originated from mobile networks, Akamai said it did not appear that mobile devices were the source.

"As noted previously, we believe that the observed attack traffic that is originating from known mobile networks is likely being generated by infected PC-type clients connecting to wireless networks through mobile broadband technologies and not by infected smartphones or similar mobile devices," according to the report.

Including all types of attack traffic sources, about 17 percent of attacks were directed at Telnet. Port 23 was "overwhelmingly the top targeted port for attacks" in Egypt, Peru and Turkey, Akamai said.

Worst moments in network security history

"It is not clear if there is a common thread that connects these three countries, nor whether these observed attacks were brute-force login attempts or some other botnet-related traffic," the report said.

Akamai found that Port 445, which is a commonly used port for Microsoft products, was the most targeted one, although the attacks declined. The attacks peaked more than a year ago due to Conficker, a worm that rapidly spread and targeted the port.

"While the percentages are still fairly significant, this decline may signal ongoing efforts by network service providers to identify and isolate infected systems, as well as ongoing efforts to patch and/or upgrade infected systems," the report said.

Port 445 attacks were responsible for much of the attack traffic in Brazil, Germany, Italy, Russia, Taiwan and the US. In China, however, attacks against SSH, which runs on Port 22, were more common than those against Port 445, Akamai said.

.

andyn
28-01-11, 08:59
Any 'corporate entity' with telnet ports open (as opposed to ssh) is already living in the past anyway tbh.

I guess that these figures make sense when you consider that any server with port 23 open is highly likely to be one which hasn't been properly secured in the first place, and therefore a good candidate for attack.

Ice Tea
28-01-11, 09:13
There was an update to the old root ipkg install exploit a few months ago using Java hole based on ports 22 and 23 that everybody was using on anything linux based from servers to Nas drives to Mobile phones so i wouldn't be surprised if it's something based on that for Root access.

DoubleTop
28-01-11, 09:30
you'd be surprised at the number of servers that have remote services running through an older port - because lazy sysadmins spot a port they can use in the pre-setup firewall configs. A quick use of telnet to watch the response from the port and it's dead easy to see what is really running on a port.

Spaceboy
28-01-11, 09:49
You wouldn't believe the number of RPC ports and services that are installed and run by default on solaris 9 and under... Most sysadmins don't even know they're running :eek:

Jonathon82
28-01-11, 12:31
We use Telnet at work to access the switch exchanges O.o didnt realise it was so vulnerable

Ice Tea
29-01-11, 07:46
If they have Internet access i hope you have SSH and a firewall installed or they at least have the service conf file limited to intenal network addresses. :D



.