View Full Version : 3dMark06 Score Frenzy
What ya got ?
heres mine http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5424835 (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5424835)
14187 with an e8400 and 8800gt ( aria superspecial one :twisted: )
check my sig m8y (cant link its a errmm specail version :redface:)
very nice , the gts definataly has the edge over the GT
http://www.seantraynor.co.uk/rig/3dmark1.PNG
its your quad that has beat me there sean, just wait till i get me a wolf, can you say 16k :D
thats a nice score that tho for only 3.6ghz.
nice score sean ! I have some better cooling on the way , so ill see if the lowly GT can catch up . . .
The old girl has served me well, had it for over a year now - this sytem!
Changed processor from E6600 to Q6600 and Asus Striker to a P35 board.
Time for an upgrade soon, me thinks :P
What! lol
~18 month upgrade cycle. :)
When you play at 1920x1200 your computer is taxed beyond belief!
running at stock
http://www.pageserve.co.uk/pc_images/3dmark.JPG
PeterStoba
28-02-08, 17:06
http://service.futuremark.com/results/showSingleResult.action?resultId=5475825&resultType=14
cleggy what did that score break down like? can you show the details like in the img in my sig plz.
^^whats that link about? i aint get an acc with them.
running at stock
http://www.pageserve.co.uk/pc_images/3dmark.JPG
very nice stock score m8 ! have you an OC score yet?
http://www.cbentertainments.co.uk/3dmark.gif
Mine :)
not yet, i'm having a few issues at the moment lol. Just bought COD4 and it crashes every now and then, 2142 plays fine, i've run OCCT and prime95 on my CPU, they seem fine. Also clocked my RAM down to 667.
http://www.cbentertainments.co.uk/3dmark.gif
Mine :)
What benchmark you running as the top score seems somewhat high for 3d06???
not yet, i'm having a few issues at the moment lol. Just bought COD4 and it crashes every now and then, 2142 plays fine, i've run OCCT and prime95 on my CPU, they seem fine. Also clocked my RAM down to 667.
ive been using prime recently to find the best 24/7 speed ( under 1.4v ) and ive found 450x9 4050mhz 900mhz ram is the best . primed stable for over 9 hours and then i stopped it to play crysis lol
Depending on what the pc is used for i wouldn't bother with prime / orthos for hours on end. MY gaming pc for instance, as long as its stable enough to play all my games for however long i want to play them for is good enough for me.
On the other hand if your using it to render / encode / decode for hours on end then its probably a good idea to make sure it is prime / orthos stable.
Depending on what the pc is used for i wouldn't bother with prime / orthos for hours on end. MY gaming pc for instance, as long as its stable enough to play all my games for however long i want to play them for is good enough for me.
On the other hand if your using it to render / encode / decode for hours on end then its probably a good idea to make sure it is prime / orthos stable.
i do agree , however , crysis at 1680x1050 all settings high will crash an unstable system . ive seen it first hand lol
Like i say depends on your definition of stable/unstable, the demo certail played fine on my setup. Thought it was pretty naff though (almost identical to farcry with slightly better gfx) so didn't buy the full game.
...it was pretty naff though (almost identical to farcry with slightly better gfx) so didn't buy the full game.
thats about all it is but if you liked farcry its right up your street :)
wonderlust
11-03-08, 17:52
ok, here is my pathetic effort:-
http://lh4.google.co.uk/jim.l.halsey/R9a8o0xW9OI/AAAAAAAAAN8/6PRQ2SpBeJo/3d%20mark%2006.JPG
ok, here is my pathetic effort:-
http://lh4.google.co.uk/jim.l.halsey/R9a8o0xW9OI/AAAAAAAAAN8/6PRQ2SpBeJo/3d%20mark%2006.JPG
Nothing showing
wonderlust
12-03-08, 11:52
Nothing showing
Eh? shows for me :S
still nothing? anyone else not seeing it?
wonderlust
12-03-08, 12:05
still nothing? anyone else not seeing it?
It's not worth the wait! only 2760
can't see anything either.
hold on let me put my specs on....
Still nothing
wonderlust
12-03-08, 12:08
just checked on my server, not showing there either, hmmm
wonderlust
12-03-08, 12:08
is this showing?
http://lh4.google.co.uk/jim.l.halsey/R9a8o0xW9OI/AAAAAAAAAN8/6PRQ2SpBeJo/3d%20mark%2006.JPG?imgmax=800
yes. can see that even without my specs ;)
wonderlust
12-03-08, 12:31
Was it worth the wait :sad:
no not really :mrgreen: I'd get it in the bin if i was you and start again ;)
wonderlust
12-03-08, 13:31
nah, just waiting for the Nvidia 98xx cards to come out so that either the 8800GT or 9600GT come to a good price
Snap :) I'm borrowing a colleagues 7950 until he needs it back or the 9600s come down a bit.
Snap :) I'm borrowing a colleagues 7950 until he needs it back or the 9600s come down a bit.
free 7950 not bad... ;) does he know your borring it though ;)
Course he does... just hope he forgets lol
i'd offer him £70 and see if you can keep it. ;)
i'd offer him £70 and see if you can keep it. ;)
I have a 7950GX2, paid £399 for it :O until it struggles on a game its not worth selling it as its worth about £100 now LOL it will certainly wipe the floor with a x1950!!
wonderlust
12-03-08, 14:06
I downloaded the HL2 Lost coast, If I run the video stress test with everything on and at my monitors native resolution (1280x1024) I get 62FPS
So the old 6800Gt has a little more life in it yet!
i'd offer him £70 and see if you can keep it. ;)
Hell - you can have my 7950GX2 for £70!
Hell - you can have my 7950GX2 for £70!
Anyone after a £70 card should snap your hand off at that, its a monster. Certainly shows up all these 8600gt's and the like :twisted:
monkey56657
12-03-08, 20:44
The server was sending "content-disposition: attachment" as one of the headers. This forces the file for download but can also cause trouble when its embedded into a web page.
What sort of score should I get for a 7950GT and E2160 at stock speeds?
Tell you what Coiler - You'rs for £70 - then you can have quad SLI!
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5767755
my latest result , 15447 with an e8400 and 8800gts :twisted:
Meh, at the default resolution the load is put onto the CPU and not the processor - i'm not going to be able to go any higher!
I'll just be safe in the knowledge that in real terms I win =D
wonderlust
08-04-08, 21:44
Ok, so here is my latest attempt, A little faster than the last one :D (like 11000 points higher :))
http://i288.photobucket.com/albums/ll177/teddyformandy/3dmark06tweaked.jpg
mine on the newwest driver
http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/7716/143ktw8.th.png (http://img255.imageshack.us/my.php?image=143ktw8.png)
wait a few days and i will have you all another.
heres mine
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6488225
heres mine
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6488225
It says no score! :redface:
it works for me
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6488225
http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=6488225&resultType=14
http://service.futuremark.com/results/showSingleResult.action
try one of the other links
http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh153/johnim_photos/3dmark06.jpg
it works for me
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6488225
Says No Score for me too
PeterStoba
29-04-08, 17:31
It does show up, he got 14307
Says No Score for me tooand me..
im not sure whats up with mine but even at stock speeds i get an error on this new mobo but everything else works fine.
Here be mine:
(i need a new motherboard to get this quad clocked further, there's still loads of juice in these cards...)
http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w31/viper1405/pwnt.jpg
And jsut for a compare, here's the same benchmark run at 1920x1200 :twisted:
http://i172.photobucket.com/albums/w31/viper1405/1920x1200clocked.jpg
wonderlust
13-05-08, 10:37
Over 1.7v ouch! :D
http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/8595/mysystemtj6.jpg
E4500@3.3ghz: HD3850 512 at stock: 2gb OCZ 800mhz ram: Vista 32bit Ultimate.
Could be higher with overclocking, but i am leaving stable at stock for the moment.
viper have you tried clocking the gpu core and shaders on their own? only i found if i dropped my shaders a bit i could go higher on the core and it helped my bench scores.
Yeah i have dude, no difference sadly :(
:( i only saw this after i posted in the showing off thread.
i would of expected more tbh tho, i know a guy who got 20k with 2 gt and a 3.8gig quad, could be the driver he had was better or was optimized for the gt not gts?
i found my sweet spot was 820/1980/1100 (c/s/m) but for some reason i cant get it to finish at all on this new mobo? it just crashes on the first test, my 14.3k was with my old setup.
:( i only saw this after i posted in the showing off thread.
i would of expected more tbh tho, i know a guy who got 20k with 2 gt and a 3.8gig quad, could be the driver he had was better or was optimized for the gt not gts?
i found my sweet spot was 820/1980/1100 (c/s/m) but for some reason i cant get it to finish at all on this new mobo? it just crashes on the first test, my 14.3k was with my old setup.
Low res mate, 100mhz on the cpu aint gonna make much difference, if it's a 45nm quad it'll be better anyway.
The gfx score on these in sli will keep increasing with cpu speed wway past 4.5ghz... i can get the same 3dmark score with a 4.2ghz dual core, the cpu score is much lower, but the gfx scores rocket upwards, just goes to show how cpu limited this system is...
I run it at 3.6ghz daily, but i do run all my games at 1920x1200 with as much aa and af as the games allow =)
http://img255.imageshack.us/my.php?image=143ktw8.png
vista so add 1k if you want to campare to xp :(
http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/4796/80822957me5.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=181944&resultType=19
my vantage score too but this only running 4ghz
eddit
can gm8 or a mod edit the first post so we have a list of all the scores on page 1?
3d 06
16514 @3ghz 8800gt sli core 726 mem1026
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=7733787 (http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=7595427&compareResultType=14)
vantage
(http://service.futuremark.com/resultComparison.action?compareResultId=260509&compareResultType=19)10379 @3ghz 8800gt sli core 732 mem1030
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=275584
This is odd, ive just upgraded my Mobo from an ASUS P5B Deluxe to an ASUS P5Q SE and memory from 3 x 1gb of 5300 standard memory to 2 x 2gb of OCZ 8500 Reaper memory and my score has actually come down on 3D Mark 06, I think I hard about 9000ish before and on the new spec I have only 5000ish, any ideas?????
I also have a Core 2 Duo E6600 cpu and a Nvidia 9800GT GPU
This is odd, ive just upgraded my Mobo from an ASUS P5B Deluxe to an ASUS P5Q SE and memory from 3 x 1gb of 5300 standard memory to 2 x 2gb of OCZ 8500 Reaper memory and my score has actually come down on 3D Mark 06, I think I hard about 9000ish before and on the new spec I have only 5000ish, any ideas?????
I also have a Core 2 Duo E6600 cpu and a Nvidia 9800GT GPU
Have you done a fresh windows install or simply ran the same HDD as previous hardware?
Yeah you would at the very least need to uninstall all the drivers from the old set up and reinstall them for the new one.
Can't just swap mobo's around unless its to replace a dead one with an identical one and expect it to work ;).
non overclock
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y65/biodoid/3DMark06.jpg
overclocked slightly
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y65/biodoid/3dmark06275OC.jpg
thought i might rez a thread :D see how your new hardware is shaping up.
this was the last driver i did with my 8200
http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30149&stc=1&d=1256916276
could of gone higher if i upped the cpu to 4.2ghz but never did and cant now so n/m.
this is the best i got with the 9550 in the p35
http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30150&stc=1&d=1256916383
but 3.6ghz was as high as it would go in that, i will throw some p45 ones up if i can get my ram working right in it :(
just noticed that the gpu is running my "normal gaming oc" in that last one so i could of gotten more if i pushed the gpu, bugger.
I tried to do mine, but my score was lower than Marsey's with his 8800 :thumbsdn::thumbsdn::thumbsdn::thumbsdn::thumbsdn: which ever way you look at it....that is a 3DMark FAIL for being biased towards ATi cards :kick::order:
PeterStoba
31-10-09, 17:58
I tried to do mine, but my score was lower than Marsey's with his 8800 :thumbsdn::thumbsdn::thumbsdn::thumbsdn::thumbsdn: which ever way you look at it....that is a 3DMark FAIL for being biased towards ATi cards :kick::order:
Or it shows your AMD CPU lacks BANDWIDTH
Sorry, I mean power.
Or it shows your AMD CPU lacks BANDWIDTH
Sorry, I mean power.
You're wrong :redface:
Mine is a BEAST...and my 3dmark gpu score goes higher the lower clocked my CPU is :redface: AMD CPUs have much more bandwidth than Intels :lol: (Phenom II vs core2). I don't think a 3.75GHz tri core would bottleneck a 4890 :lol:
My GPU score was just alot lower than a 8800s :thumbsdn::thumbsdn:
http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/9192/76641673.th.png (http://img297.imageshack.us/i/76641673.png/)
I don't know what else you can call that except BIASED :p
PeterStoba
31-10-09, 20:17
Hwbot shows people with 3.6Ghz Intel Dual cores and stock graphics cards scoring within 100 points of you.
Hwbot shows people with 3.6Ghz Intel Dual cores and stock graphics cards scoring within 100 points of you.
That's pretty bad, I always thought 3Dmark was a level playing field but apparently not with Intel and Nvidia components having a advantage.
intel cpu are stronger m8, and the more intensive the app is on the cpu the more that shows. as for the gpu score, well my 8800 beats the "newwer" gts250 so make of that what you will.
atis' line is they do their drivers for games not 3dmark, personally i think thats a cop out but....if ati cards where the more powerfull im sure ati would want to show this in things like 3dmark or f@h as well as just optimising their drivers for games.
o btw i reran it in the p35 and upped the gpu clocks to the max i can do unless the airtemp is freezing and got 16.6k :)
intel cpu are stronger m8, and the more intensive the app is on the cpu the more that shows. as for the gpu score, well my 8800 beats the "newwer" gts250 so make of that what you will.
atis' line is they do their drivers for games not 3dmark, personally i think thats a cop out but....if ati cards where the more powerfull im sure ati would want to show this in things like 3dmark or f@h as well as just optimising their drivers for games.
o btw i reran it in the p35 and upped the gpu clocks to the max i can do unless the airtemp is freezing and got 16.6k :)
I totally acknowledge that clock for clock your Q9550 is more powerful than my Phenom II that is DONE. I got my Phenom II for other reasons. The thing that's weird and biased is the gpu score, I mean I'm sure you'll all agree a 4890 would totally trash a 8800 in ever game in the 'real' world, I would have just thought that 3DMark would be more realistic...I mean c'mon it's apparently a level playing field ;)
yea, im most cases your card should be about 10% faster than mine but im not sure i would agree with it trashing it.
if i only got 60fps in game "x" your 66fps isnt exactly that far ahead is it?
yea, im most cases your card should be about 10% faster than mine but im not sure i would agree with it trashing it.
if i only got 60fps in game "x" your 66fps isnt exactly that far ahead is it?
I think this should show you the difference ;) obviously ignore the ones which have the same FPS, as that is when its CPU bottlenecked :)
[/URL][URL="http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-cards-charts-2009-high-quality/compare,1534.html?prod%5B2831%5D=on&prod%5B2822%5D=on"]Tom's Hardware - Benchmark The Last Remnant (http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-cards-charts-2009-high-quality/compare,1534.html?prod)
no, a 4890 is only just better than a 216 260 m8, it is between the 260 and 275 yes but its performance is closer to the 260 over all than the 275 as it just gets better the higher the res.
even if i said it was 20% better it would still only give you a 72fps in a a game where i got 60, still not trashed is it?
no, a 4890 is only just better than a 216 260 m8, it is between the 260 and 275 yes but its performance is closer to the 260 over all than the 275 as it just gets better the higher the res.
even if i said it was 20% better it would still only give you a 72fps in a a game where i got 60, still not trashed is it?
Ahh see, if you look in the link I posted you the extra performance that makes a 4890 and 4890 is when for example...in Far Cry 2 (settings: 1920x1200, 4AA, 8AF) a 4890 gets 50FPS where as a 8800 gets 26FPS.
4980 = enjoyable and definitely playable
8800 = barely playable
Its when call eye candy is turned on the 8800 gets left behind...not that, that is bad because I mean its a old card now you can't expect it to keep up.
Tom's Hardware - Benchmark Fallout 3 (http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/gaming-graphics-cards-charts-2009-high-quality/compare,1534.html?prod%5B2798%5D=on&prod%5B2831%5D=on&prod%5B2802%5D=on&prod%5B2822%5D=on)
That kinda shows how the GTX200 + 4890 are fairly far ahead, with the exception of a few games which I guess are down to different internal architecture.
my 8800 is a card that fails above 16/10 m8 19/12 is well above its abilities no doubt.
thing is 3dmark 06 is ran at 12/10 and you are right you should be scoring higher, just did a look and a 4870 with a duo should score higher than i did in those screens but i should also be scoring above 17/17.5k so i think its about time i did a clean install as this one is very old now and must be more cluttered up than i thought.
edit
i didnt see your post with the link m8 but those are tests that really show my point about this card at higher res, the tests you chose with lower res the difference is nowhere near double like @19/12.
lol @ will and the ninja edit :D
my 8800 is a card that fails above 16/10 m8 19/12 is well above its abilities no doubt.
thing is 3dmark 06 is ran at 12/10 and you are right you should be scoring higher, just did a look and a 4870 with a duo should score higher than i did in those screens but i should also be scoring above 17/17.5k so i think its about time i did a clean install as this one is very old now and must be more cluttered up than i thought.
edit
i didnt see your post with the link m8 but those are tests that really show my point about this card at higher res, the tests you chose with lower res the difference is nowhere near double like @19/12.
lol @ will and the ninja edit :D
ahaha damn you saw it ;)
I noticed the same...people especially on 3dmark 06 are getting alot higher scores than me, with dual cores...something fishey is going on here :cop:
:D yea i saw:cop:
i think mine is down to my install tbh but you can get some massive gains in this (and alot of other synthetics) by tightening your subtimings with memset, mem performance really does improve cpu performance.
dp 4 teh win baby :D
i just love chatting wid meself tbh :D
http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30985&stc=1&d=1259515059
had some time to reinstall and that, didnt tweak the os so i know i could eek a few more points out of it but tbh i cba with that any more.
happy with it tbh, for an 8800 anyway :D
come on, loads of new faces around here of late, get the benchmarks out and show us how good you pc is :)
Here's my best effort, to date :D
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/8743/3dm06.jpg
http://h.imagehost.org/0144/Best.png
mighty impressive scores from the 5000 series cards guys :D
but whats going on with the massive drop from sm3 to 2?
The PII's aren't so great with 3Dmark.
Either way, a single GPU with a PII and almost 23k I'm happy.
yea, about clock for clock with your faster ram (guessing its @1066?) you was 500 down but its loads better with the pII than the first one.
5870 out does the 4870x2 in most cases tho.
Nah it doesn't. The 4870x2's better than a 5870 lol.
Or at least it was in 9.10.
My 5870 at stock 9.10 drivers PII 940 at 3.7GHZ got less than my 4870x2 with PII 940 at 3.7GHZ.
it might of been a pre oc'd edition card in the review i was thinking of, will do a search and see in a mo, but theres not much in them going off your results and those i have seen in this with the 48x2.
you scored higher here than some i have seen with 48x2 either way m8, could be drivers i guess but never the less, more is better :D
edit
another nice apples vs oranges thing. (http://www.overclock.net/ati/616260-number-crunching-5970-vs-gtx-295-a.html) interesting to look at the numbers they throw out tho :)
CPU's a massive factor in this. A q6600 at 4.1GHZ and a 4870x2 (With my card at stock) would knack myscore.
The PII's aren't so great with 3Dmark.
Either way, a single GPU with a PII and almost 23k I'm happy.
Can you show use a GPUz screenshot of your 5870 overclocked?
http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/a8ugp/
It's different to my sig, as my sig is what I run 24/7.
It's different to my sig, as my sig is what I run 24/7.
actual GPUz screenshot?
http://a.imagehost.org/t/0979/GPUZ.jpg (http://a.imagehost.org/view/0979/GPUZ)http://a.imagehost.org/view/0071/GPUZ
good stuff, when i opened the link it showed some 'naughty girly' pictures :p
Finally broke 30k :D
http://img521.imageshack.us/img521/4628/30073.png
we really need a new one of this thread too seeing as nobody updates these score into a table either.
nice1 :D 30k :eek:
And a tad more
(The cards ARE OCd to 875/1250) but not showing in CPUZ :S
Must get them flashed :)
http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6415/30444.png (http://img442.imageshack.us/img442/6415/30444.png)
Andrew Moore
11-12-09, 13:17
Its a shame nvidia cards are useless at 3dm06. I am content however in pushing 40k (without physx) in vantage so all is good for me :P
Andy
Its a shame nvidia cards are useless at 3dm06. I am content however in pushing 40k (without physx) in vantage so all is good for me :P
Andy
that made me lol
vapourmike
17-12-09, 11:09
Problem with this bench is its all CPU clock speed based ... you get seriously high scores from a simple clock, I can get this from my rig with NO clocks or mods other than using the i7's built in 'on the fly mini overclocking'.
http://www.vapournet.com/rig/3dmark06n3.jpg
I can get 30k+ if I go to 4ghz+ on the CPU but I was having heat issues and really need to get some WC in.
Problem with this bench is its all CPU clock speed based ... you get seriously high scores from a simple clock, I can get this from my rig with NO clocks or mods other than using the i7's built in 'on the fly mini overclocking'.
http://www.vapournet.com/rig/3dmark06n3.jpg
I can get 30k+ if I go to 4ghz+ on the CPU but I was having heat issues and really need to get some WC in.
Quite an interesting score, my 5870 and Phenom II @ 4.1GHZ is only around 1500 less.
More interesting is the fact the new drivers should add some performance and my new motherboard comes tomorrow, with a benchmark at 4.2GHZ and these new drivers, I should be able to match your i7 at 3.2GHZ.
http://picasaweb.google.co.uk/welshy46/Pictures#5418504102561871298Its my avatar
Few more points
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/4607/30769.jpg
have you tried to tighten the timings with only 6gb of ram?
I havent - I still had 12Gig in for that jus, just on one of my 32Bit OS partitions
May well give it a try :D
There seems to be such a huge difference between my CPU 3D mark score and one I saw on tomshardware.
http://media.bestofmicro.com/E/X/232521/original/016_3dmark_cpu.png
With my 4th core unlocked @ 3.4GHz my CPU is around 11,000.
How does that Phenom II 965 manage to get 34,000 :redface:
Its running on DDR3 with a GTX260.
Its running on DDR3 with a GTX260.
Would guess thats the reason, physxs on that etc.
Andrew Moore
18-01-10, 12:21
Would guess thats the reason, physxs on that etc.
Indeed you are correct. The GTX260 takes over for the physx processing in the test etc giving a major boost. I get around 26k on an i7 920 at 4.7ghz when physx is disabled. I get 57k when its turned on and my gtx285 is doing the work.
Andy
my best score so far
http://service.futuremark.com/home.action?resultId=11409933&resultType=14
My current set up, graphics cards are not overclocked.. Having issues overclocking them in SLI :|
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4074/22k.th.png (http://img36.imageshack.us/i/22k.png/)
My current set up, graphics cards are not overclocked.. Having issues overclocking them in SLI :|
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/4074/22k.th.png (http://img36.imageshack.us/i/22k.png/)
Nice score on 8800's :)
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=13289219
little update :)
theelusiveyoda
26-02-10, 14:48
Old run on windows 32bit
http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/8357/rampageformulaq9450.jpg
http://img202.imageshack.us/i/27147.png/
27K Core i7 920 at 4459Mhz and HD5850 at 1000Mhz core and 1200Mhz mem
Screenie or it didn't happen or at least a compare linky??
;)
Well I tryed to post a picture, but it just shows a little box with a red X :confused:
Here's the link: http://img202.imageshack.us/i/27147.png/
:thumb:
Wow, the 3dMark06 is 514MB in size, I'll have to d/l it tomorrow and put my test scores up from my AMD 64 4000+. :)
Not sure my old laptop would even run 3dMark06 :D
Mr. Strawberry
10-04-10, 23:23
got past 20k :D
http://i682.photobucket.com/albums/vv188/stevenwright6379/awesome.png
But can you play any better :p
Mr. Strawberry
10-04-10, 23:49
i doubt it :D
Load up CS:S and see what FPS that card is giving :)
Mr. Strawberry
11-04-10, 00:26
i am **** at CS:S though
Same for most of us due to the fact that CS:S is full of cheaters and wallhackers.
Take it and lose like a man. :D :P :p
Mr. Strawberry
11-04-10, 00:32
i don't even have it installed :/
Well here is my BLAZINGLY fast score!!
3DMark Score 714 3DMarks
SM 2.0 Score 339
CPU Score 951
CPU AMD Athlon 64 4000+
CPU Speed 2677 MHz
GPU ATI Radeon X700 Series
Memory 2048 MB
714 3D Marks? That's it? Damn! And this is with my CPU overclocked too! lol . I can't wait to get my new i7 960 system up and running.
Can't see a thread for this, so I'll start.
http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=4DCA3E89FF9F922BC3C05D5E261 3E287
Phenom II 1055T at 4150MHZ
5870 crossfire
That just links me to my own page....
Core i7 920 C0 @ 3.6Ghz GTX460 768Mb
http://www.upload3r.com/serve/070810/1281204560.png
For some reason i can't OC my 920 any higher than 3.6Ghz, it did do 3.8Ghz??? Must be my poop mobo.
The default settings on the free trial.
And god dammit, I messed up my link :p
I had 25,383.
Phenom II 955 @ 3.7Ghz 2x 4890's @ stock
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/3dm06-3.jpg
Helios1234
07-08-10, 18:11
The best I got was 26272 with a 5870+5850 both running at stock speeds.
The best I got was 26272 with a 5870+5850 both running at stock speeds.
I'm heavily CPU limited with two 5870's at 1005MHZ on the core lol.
I had my 1055T running 4150MHZ.
But it only uses 4 cores, and given an i7 is alot better clock for clock, due to instructions, architecture, and a higher i7 clock, I don't stand a chance getting higher than 26k if I'm lucky lol.
Helios1234
07-08-10, 19:07
I'm heavily CPU limited with two 5870's at 1005MHZ on the core lol.
I had my 1055T running 4150MHZ.
But it only uses 4 cores, and given an i7 is alot better clock for clock, due to instructions, architecture, and a higher i7 clock, I don't stand a chance getting higher than 26k if I'm lucky lol.
:p, it's tough to beat those I7s on the CPU tests and 3DMark06 is far too CPU limited these days.
Nice clocks on the x6 and 5870s though!:thumb:
merged this with the old 3dm06 thread :thumb:
martin you need to set your results a public mate ;)
edit
http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=30985&stc=1&d=1259515059
i aint ran it in an age tbh, this was when i had just got this board and just got 500fsb stable :D
http://service.futuremark.com/home.action;jsessionid=15F4B91B691806820CD67F67A35 F5651
i7 at 3.2Ghz
Card at stock speed.
AaronWHUFC
07-08-10, 19:44
Wrong link :p
Im confused Aaron it works for me.:thumb:
AaronWHUFC
07-08-10, 19:48
Damn ninja edit ;)
Lol.Im confused.com, that is nothing new for me mate.
AaronWHUFC
07-08-10, 19:56
Its stopped showing me it again...strange :S
20021 3DMarks
Edit. How strange, it works on my gaming pc which is were I ran it now the link when I click on it on my laptop is knackered. So sorry Aaron.
Just a quick run for now.
http://i38.tinypic.com/s458w1.jpg
http://www.upload3r.com/serve/090810/1281345572.png
here's mine with the 4890:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=14350734
doesn't look right to me :|
http://a.imageshack.us/img37/5941/capturemx.png (http://img37.imageshack.us/i/capturemx.png/)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
Here's my 3Dm06 score -
http://a.imageshack.us/img705/2913/3dmarkscorespecs.jpg
http://a.imageshack.us/img825/2681/3dmarkscore.jpg
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=14411801
My humble score.
theelusiveyoda
22-08-10, 18:42
will upload my score later trying to get to 25,000+ before i upload as i was only 3 points of it just. and that was with my 5870 at stock.
Here's my 3Dm06 score -
http://a.imageshack.us/img705/2913/3dmarkscorespecs.jpg
http://a.imageshack.us/img825/2681/3dmarkscore.jpg
Nice score, I expect mine to be similar when i get my 1055t :D
AmdOverclocker
22-08-10, 20:10
hi, i score 14775 marks, how i upload?
http://imageshack.us/
Hope this helps, up load the image, and then copy and paste the forum code.
like Zaims.http://a.imageshack.us/img705/2913/3dmarkscorespecs.jpg
AmdOverclocker
22-08-10, 20:46
http://imageshack.us/
Hope this helps, up load the image, and then copy and paste the forum code.
like Zaims.http://a.imageshack.us/img705/2913/3dmarkscorespecs.jpg
thanks
17069 3DMarks
When I benched it on Jul 2008 lol :chairfall:
e8400 / gtx280 nowt changed since 2008 except SSD drives.
Still does everything I need it to.
actually have 6gb of ram not -1mb lol
http://i33.tinypic.com/fclh5v.jpg
Best I can do tonight. Small overclock on the 4870 (really can't get much more out of it) and 4.133GHz on the Phenom. I've been up to 17400 in the past but sadly don't have a screenshot any more...
http://i33.tinypic.com/ejirv9.jpg
PS Yes I know my gadgets need updating, I plan to format Windows tomoz :)
Nice score, I expect mine to be similar when i get my 1055t :D
Thanks :)
actually have 6gb of ram not -1mb lol
http://i33.tinypic.com/fclh5v.jpg
Your cpu and gpu are clocked higher than mine yet you score slightly less. :confused:
My ram is lower then yours, it's only at 756mhz :(
redrooster303
24-08-10, 01:48
when i first got my two 1gb 460's at 725/1450/3800 with an i7 860@3.7ghz i got 24453. i then OCed the msi 1gb 460's to 800/1600/4000 and with the cpu the same got 24393. so that means i got less with the 2 460's overclocked than i did when they were at stock, does this mean the cards are being bottlenecked by the cpu in 3dmark 06. this only happens in 3dmark 06 though, the benchmark goes up in other tests when i OC by about 10%.
this is doing my head in as i can't work it out lol. anyone had the same issues?? :):confused:
Here's my updated score:
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=14513881
theelusiveyoda
29-08-10, 22:24
managed to beat 25,000
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=14484980
I did a bench at 4.4GHZ on my 1055T with my single 5870 and managed 25,430 lol, I've got the link, but it's not as good as my Crossfired results were (Although, they were MASSIVELY CPU limited, around 3k lol)
managed to beat 25,000
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=14484980
Nice score mate.
theelusiveyoda
29-08-10, 22:48
thanks mate,
i need to bench at 4.7ghz but cant atm.
thanks mate,
i need to bench at 4.7ghz but cant atm.
Have you thought of doing this trick, just for a benching run ?.
http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3396&page=119
Scroll down to me.
How you getting on with the rampage extreme ?.
theelusiveyoda
30-08-10, 18:08
the rampage extreme is awesome, the highest i got it so far is 230blck, the heatsinks need quite abit of cooling at over 200blck though.
theelusiveyoda
30-08-10, 18:09
i might try your idea for benching just need to get some more tubing, will try it out with a 240 rad.
I can hit 22,000 with the Rig in my sig, hopefully when i get a different X58 mobo at the end of the week i can hit 4Ghz and get close to 25,000.
watercooled
31-08-10, 17:46
is 20584 a good score with e8400 and hd4890 xfire ?
is 20584 a good score with e8400 and hd4890 xfire ?
Wonder what i would get with two 4890's :D shame my mb is sli only.
Wonder what i would get with two 4890's :D shame my mb is sli only.
Sell the 4890 get some GTX460's.
Sell the 4890 get some GTX460's.
ye, i would if i could afford it :cool:
although a 4890 is overkill at 1280x1024.
theelusiveyoda
07-09-10, 01:53
http://service.futuremark.com/resultAnalyzer.action?resultId=14566791&resultType=14
4.2ghz not 4.3ghz like it says in the cpu speed section, messing around with qpi voltage
http://img837.imageshack.us/img837/4259/3dmark36.png (http://img837.imageshack.us/i/3dmark36.png/)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
At 3.6Ghz card at stock.
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6730/3dmark06159.jpg
@3.7 card at stock.
Good score mate, it should be with your card.:)
http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/6730/3dmark06159.jpg
@3.7 card at stock.
What's this 'stock' thing you talk of.
Not overclocked mate.
I was only joking mate. Cant wait to see some real results. Get pushing Snakey.
Yeh, get pushing snakey, it's short of my PII @ 4.4GHZ and a 5870 :p
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh212/k3vst3r_oc/3dmark06.png
Not bad
theelusiveyoda
16-09-10, 10:07
i wonder if i can break 27,000 with a single gpu :rolleyes:
http://i55.tinypic.com/nnmk9v.jpg
I remembered why I didn't like my 4890. They really did suck at 3D Mark..
watercooled
20-09-10, 17:45
I remembered why I didn't like my 4890. They really did suck at 3D Mark..
maybe but in games they are still up there with the best of them especially 2 of them.. :)
maybe but in games they are still up there with the best of them especially 2 of them.. :)
+1, in mw2 the fps doesn't drop below 92, goes to 79 when u walk through smoke tho. the other thing is the fps won't go above 92 its as if there is a fps limiter on. v-sync is off.
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh212/k3vst3r_oc/3dmark0644GHz910core27682.jpg
:thumb:
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh212/k3vst3r_oc/3dmark0644GHz910core27682.jpg
:thumb:
Nice score mate.
http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=40049&stc=1&d=1294392109
thought i wouls rez a dead thread :D
seeing as its the only gpu bench installed its as good a place to start as any but from what i have seen a few drivers are better than this 1.
nice score marsey99 my system bags a similar score to yours
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/3dm6870.jpg
jointhedotz
09-01-11, 00:07
http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15266729 (http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15265959)
:-(
i r poor :-(
Riskitall84
09-01-11, 13:20
Here is my X4 955 run
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/8164/95783623.png
http://forums.techpowerup.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=40049&stc=1&d=1294392109
thought i wouls rez a dead thread :D
seeing as its the only gpu bench installed its as good a place to start as any but from what i have seen a few drivers are better than this 1.
Any voltage bump for that overclock on the GPU?
yea mate, max ab wil let me have xD
1.087v iirc
yea mate, max ab wil let me have xD
1.087v iirc
Cheers, im busy Furmarking 860 core with 4000 mem with 1062mv
How long should i test in Furmark for before you consider stable?
Just found this one from when I had my GTX460 SLI:
http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/6241/3dm06stock.png
overclocked my dual gtx 295's and my i7 930 @ 4ghz.. cpu shows 2.399 as it steps downs when not needed.
not bad for old hardware
http://i204.photobucket.com/albums/bb37/m4rmite/BENCH.jpg
isnt thay Vantage :P
And and olf 5879CF score:
http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/4607/30769.jpg
sean i use kom and leave it running till i get bored tbh xD i still have the voltage unlock tweak to use yet too but i aint got that bored yet as im still testing driver versions out.
tb you have the same 460 as me, what can you get out of them on their own?
wow marmite, im glad i dont pay your leccy bill mate :D but thats vantage, we have another thread for that bench too ;)
yeah i noticed after i posted it im downloading the 1.2 update for 06.. ill run it next
tb you have the same 460 as me, what can you get out of them on their own?
I only have the one now - I'll give it s whirl - any particular clock on the CPU?
:D
what can yours do?
i didnt know yours was the same, your going to hate me now as i want to know what volts you need for what clocks and how hot it runs and everything :rofl:
k 3dmark 06 ver 1.2
26768
http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15268683
Lol - it's the Gigabyte pre OC with the twin coolers
It will run most benches at 900/2000 at the max volts on afterburner (I'll check) and maxes out at 66 degrees benching 06 - just running it now :P
k 3dmark 06 ver 1.2
26768
http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15268683
are you sure its using all your gpu cores there? only i would of expect more from that setup tbh :|
yea tb mines the same, the voltage unlocker wc posted in my 460 owners thread works on these you know :D
i changed my tim last night on this 1 and its dropped my load temps by 4/5c and idle by 1c.
how low can you drop the voltage at stock (well 715) clocks? if you have tried it. i have been running 850/2000 on 1.012v pretty much since i started to play with it.
are you sure its using all your gpu cores there? only i would of expect more from that setup tbh :|
yea tb mines the same, the voltage unlocker wc posted in my 460 owners thread works on these you know :D
i changed my tim last night on this 1 and its dropped my load temps by 4/5c and idle by 1c.
how low can you drop the voltage at stock (well 715) clocks? if you have tried it. i have been running 850/2000 on 1.012v pretty much since i started to play with it.
Given my score (below) I dont think all cores are being utilised !
Ive not messed about with this card TBH as it is just a stop gap from selling my 5870s and waiting for my 580s :D
Just ran the single GTX460 and :
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/2692/26765.png
Why are you underclocking? let it go to 17GHZ!
yea, for a gpu with no ram that sure does well in 3d mark xD
And no CUDA cores either :D
@marsey99 3dmark06 is more cpu biased thats what vantage is for.. gpu biased.
Riskitall84
09-01-11, 20:01
1055T 95 Watt and a GTX 470 - Love this CPU!
http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/4175/0012b.png
Great OC :thumb:
What's your mobo?
Riskitall84
09-01-11, 20:40
Great OC :thumb:
What's your mobo?
Well it was a Crosshair IV but its now property of RAWZ
[QUOTE=Riskitall84;785061]Here is my X4 955 run
could u send me that background or post it please :)
and sas u need to start to run them with gpuz 0.5
and put valid 3dmark link just so i can compair with mine that
Score:
17616 3DMarks (http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15270396)
Damn CPU bottlenecking my PC again...
Score:
17616 3DMarks (http://3dmark.com/3dm06/15270396)
Damn CPU bottlenecking my PC again...
looks a little like that but then u cant play 3dmark so long as games are fine ide not worrie
The 3dmark website doesnt seem to like the latest ATI drivers - claims i cant compare results as the drivers arent supported?
yes they allways a few drivers behind it seems but i dont see why it wont let u compair i can yours vs mine
Marmite, I think.the.fact.that dx10 is pretty much a dead api is the reason behind vantage being pointless to me. not many games use it while most are dx9 based and have dx11 features so 06 and 11 are the benches of choice imo.
06 does give a big % of the score to the cpu side but I think that reflects more on what they expected gaming to be like today and not as many did go as big on the physics side other then maybe crysis.
managed to brake 24k :D
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/3dm6870-1.jpg
iGoD ReLeNtLeS
10-01-11, 19:05
Marmite, I think.the.fact.that dx10 is pretty much a dead api is the reason behind vantage being pointless to me. not many games use it while most are dx9 based and have dx11 features so 06 and 11 are the benches of choice imo.
06 does give a big % of the score to the cpu side but I think that reflects more on what they expected gaming to be like today and not as many did go as big on the physics side other then maybe crysis.
that would be why they gave me a free copy of vantage with my new RAM :lol:
managed to brake 24k :D
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/3dm6870-1.jpg
i know necro revive but just killed my top score :weeee
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/David843DM06.jpg
29k @catrain
saw yours and realised i haven't ran 3dmark06 since i got SB, heres mine
http://i53.tinypic.com/23r1l6g.jpg
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.