View Full Version : 6700 v 6850
dave@hpcb.net
09-09-07, 20:32
I am about to build a new gaming pc and was going to use the E6700 cpu, but i see there is now the E6850 which is cheaper but the clock speed is faster. Speed normally means more money so which is the best one to go for? :?
The higher clocked one is better, there trying to encourage use of the newer chips..
dave@hpcb.net
09-09-07, 20:51
cheers
I'm pretty sure the E6850 is faster in stock because it has a 333MHz FSB compared 9x multiplier to give 3GHz clock speed but the E6700 has 10x multiplier so will be faster at the same FSB.
[quote:6f4ec6dd23=\"cleggypdc\"]I'm pretty sure the E6850 is faster in stock because it has a 333MHz FSB compared 9x multiplier to give 3GHz clock speed but the E6700 has 10x multiplier so will be faster at the same FSB.[/quote:6f4ec6dd23]
The difference in performance per clock is minimal. Like 1-3% if memory serves.
But the E6850's clock is faster so obviously it will outperform the E6700 by a fair amount. And it's cheaper, more future-proof etc. Just get it. ;D
dave@hpcb.net
11-09-07, 19:23
many thanx for the info guys
I think I am right in saying that:
To use an Exx50 CPU you will need a motherboard that supports a FSB of 1333Mhz.
[Removed at the request of the author]
[quote:80904d40a7=\"PrivatePyle@Work\"]My understanding is that to get 1,333 out of the Exx50 series you need a compatible motherboard. But the processor should work in a board that supports 1066.[/quote:80904d40a7]
Yeah, sorry, I should have said:
To get the most out of an Exx50 you need a 1,333Mhz FSB. You can still use one on a 1,066Mhz FSB motherboard but it will effectively be underclocked.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.