View Full Version : Unigine Heaven Benchmark 2.1 - Scores and Tables -
Righto then, thought some of you overclocking nuts and that might liike a benchmark table for general performances comparisons with each others computers! Should also give a bit of a better idea for bang for buck with certain processors and graphics cards.
Basically, this is a free benchmarking software. Download it, install it run it!
Another bonus is all those linux users on here can run it aswell, which is always good.
Download From here (http://unigine.com/products/heaven/)
Use the settings below
API: DX10/DX11
Shaders: High
Stereo 3D: disabled
Shaders: High
Tessellation: Normal
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-Aliasing: 8x
Full Screen: YES!
Resolution: 1280x1024, 1680x1050, 1920x1080
Anything i have missed or whatever let me know please :)
Please discuss HERE
(http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread.php?t=21235)
Andrew Moore
26-05-10, 00:39
Thanks Vig, Will keep an eye on this!
Stickied!
Andy
http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b269/Vigoro/unigine.jpg
First run, no overclocks on anything :) If everyone else could post this screen from the end of the benchmark it would be appreciated, as it shows the result is valid, and show hardware!
Andrew Moore
26-05-10, 13:52
***** posts moved to discussion *****
Andy
Hers my gameing rig @ stock settings :)
Just opened and clicked run (1440/900 DX11)>
http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu250/Scunster/Benchin/th_uGINE1.jpg (http://s652.photobucket.com/albums/uu250/Scunster/Benchin/?action=view¤t=uGINE1.jpg)
Setting DX10 and 1280/1024 res>
http://i652.photobucket.com/albums/uu250/Scunster/Benchin/th_Ugine2.jpg (http://s652.photobucket.com/albums/uu250/Scunster/Benchin/?action=view¤t=Ugine2.jpg)
I was not sure what res to use so I used 1680x1050. Also I get stuttering in this version which I didnt get with the previous unigene version hence the min fps. I apologise if the images are to big.
DX9
http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/6892/dx9.jpg
DX10
http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/9587/dx10.jpg
DX11
http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/8798/dx11f.jpg
Also I get stuttering in this version which I didnt get with the previous unigene version hence the min fps.
me too,.. well more of a freeze for a second or 2 every so often!!!
Pour vous!
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/3332/benchmarks.png
run from me at my native res
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/uhbm.jpg
i just ran this at stock with the most basic settings we should probably use for everyone and another thread for max settings.
http://img532.imageshack.us/img532/2116/stockbasicheaven.png
Zodiark your running version 2.0 mate not 2.1.
thats because i FAIL and didnt realise their was a new version.
thanks for the tip mate
No worries mate the link is on the OP.It need's someone to post proper setting's so we call all run the same otherwise it's a waste of time.
Edited to run with 8xaa as suggested.
DX 10 and 11 at 1280 x 1024.
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/6348/uniginebench10.jpg (http://img18.imageshack.us/i/uniginebench10.jpg/)
http://img707.imageshack.us/img707/6636/uniginebench11.jpg (http://img707.imageshack.us/i/uniginebench11.jpg/)
Didn't change any settings, 5850 running at 900/1225.
No worries mate the link is on the OP.It need's someone to post proper setting's so we call all run the same otherwise it's a waste of time.
Exactly we need to decide on some settings.
No worries mate the link is on the OP.It need's someone to post proper setting's so we call all run the same otherwise it's a waste of time.
Exactly we need to decide on some settings.
^^ THAT ^^ :D
Here my results of the Unigine Heaven 2.1 Benchmark:
Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)
Heaven Benchmark v2.1
FPS:39.2
Scores:987
Min FPS:8.2
Max FPS:73.8
Hardware
Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release May 21 2010
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
CPU flags:2499MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series 8.723.0.0 CrossFireX 1024Mb
Settings
Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:16x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Replication:disabled
Tessellation:normal
Nice score. Have you got 5970's in crossfirex?
Nice score. Have you got 5970's in crossfirex?
Nope.. only one 5970... but since the card works with two GPUs the driver adresses the card with crossfire settings.
Anyway, I was surprised aswell, 'cause earlier versions of the Heaven Benchmark weren't producing such satisfying results...
So... what about unified settings?
Perhaps these?:
DirectX 11
1280 x 1024 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:16x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Replication:disabled
Tessellation:normal
run from me at my native res
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/uhbm.jpg
Hmm... same settings, different results...
Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)
Heaven Benchmark v2.1
FPS:90.9
Scores:2290
Min FPS:4.2
Max FPS:185.7
Hardware
Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release May 21 2010
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
CPU flags:2499MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series 8.723.0.0 CrossFireX 1024Mb
Settings
Render: direct3d10
Mode: 1680x1050 fullscreen
Shaders: high
Textures: high
Filter: trilinear
Anisotropy: 4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction: enabled
Volumetric: enabled
Replication: disabled
Tessellation: disabled
Interessting... significantly lower frame rates at the lower end, but the other way around at the upper end.
you have not got the same settings.. tesse is off lol
you have not got the same settings.. tesse is off lol
???
Interessting... significantly lower frame rates at the lower end, but the other way around at the upper end.
did you get stuttering in the benchmark if you are try this
before you benchmark got into the settings tab and change the AA value to something higher eg if it set as 0 choose x2 then apply the settings the benchmark engine should reload then go back and change the AA to what it was before apply the settings wait for the engine to reload and then stuttering should have gone away
EDIT: 1280x1024 and 1680x1050 DX10 runs with new settings
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/uhbm2.jpg
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/uhbm1.jpg
did you get stuttering in the benchmark if you are try this
before you benchmark got into the settings tab and change the AA value to something higher eg if it set as 0 choose x2 then apply the settings the benchmark engine should reload then go back and change the AA to what it was before apply the settings wait for the engine to reload and then stuttering should have gone away
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/uhbm1.jpg
I don't think that your procedure is necessary. The problem seems to be the fact that at the start not all textures are loaded into the graphicscard's memory. For me it proved sufficient to switch between all cams with "enter" at least once.
Unigine (http://unigine.com/products/unigine/)
Heaven Benchmark v2.1
FPS:73.5
Scores:1851
Min FPS:39.0
Max FPS:120.6
Hardware
Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release May 21 2010
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
CPU flags:2499MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series 8.723.0.0 CrossFireX 1024Mb
Settings
Render:direct3d10
Mode:1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Replication:disabled
Tessellation:disabled
ok then i went for the highest settings avaiable.
for this run used 4ghz on the 930
2mhz on the ram
and 900/1250 on both the 5770's
this is what i got..only around 150 points less than the 480...
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/6225/heavenextreme.jpg
ok then i went for the highest settings avaiable.
for this run used 4ghz on the 930
2mhz on the ram
and 900/1250 on both the 5770's
this is what i got..only around 150 points less than the 480...
Q8300 with 2.5 Mhz, 6 gig Ram DDR2, and an slightly OC hd5970
Heaven Benchmark v2.1
FPS:26.1
Scores:656
Min FPS:10.0
Max FPS:70.2
Hardware
Binary:Windows 32bit Visual C++ 1500 Release May 21 2010
Operating system:Windows 7 (build 7600) 64bit
CPU model:Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q8300 @ 2.50GHz
CPU flags:2499MHz MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE41 HTT
GPU model:ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series 8.723.0.0 CrossFireX 1024Mb
Settings
Render:direct3d11
Mode:1920x1080 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Replication:disabled
Tessellation:extreme
not much better for 3 times the price of my cards!
The OP has been changed and now has the setting's for everyone to run.It will hopefully give a decent spread of result's.
not much better for 3 times the price of my cards!
ja... you are right.. nevertheless my whole system is stock and not really high end... instead of yours...
for me it shows the potential of the 5870 processor (in crossfirex)
besides... my comments are not for bragging... i am just interested in the differences gpu's, cpu's and frequencies bring along.
is there anyone with a gtx 470 or 480 here?
The OP has been changed and now has the setting's for everyone to run.It will hopefully give a decent spread of result's.
The WHAT has been changed?
With the new settings in the OP @1680x1050 Dx11 8xAA
http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/5133/11966947.png (http://img408.imageshack.us/i/11966947.png/) Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
:D Im happy. Although im now interested in 5870 crossfirex.
With the new settings in the OP @1680x1050 Dx11 8xAA
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
:D Im happy. Although im now interested in 5870 crossfirex.
The 5970 gives us this...
FPS:44.9
Scores:1131
Min FPS:27.6
Max FPS:89.1
Settings
Render:direct3d11
Mode:1680x1050 8xAA fullscreen
Shaders:high
Textures:high
Filter:trilinear
Anisotropy:4x
Occlusion:enabled
Refraction:enabled
Volumetric:enabled
Replication:disabledTessellation:normal
It would be interesting to see how 5870 cf performs against a 5970 in tessalation.
It would be interesting to see how 5870 cf performs against a 5970 in tessalation.
Then go and get a second one :)
the 5870's in cf would win ourirght ill tell you that now.
AaronWHUFC
30-05-10, 13:12
the 5870's in cf would win ourirght ill tell you that now.
Yeah, twice the GPU means twice the tesselation power!
Yeah, twice the GPU means twice the tesselation power!
In fact there is no difference between two 5870s and one 5970 except the frequencies. Both solutions make use of two of one and the sames GPUs, both work in crossfirex mode.
If you are able to overclock your 5970 to the same frequencies the 5870 is using, there shouldn't be any difference at all result wise.
I for myself can't go that far, 'cause my PSU is giving up at 770 Mhz for the GPU and 1200 Mhz for the memory. Too much power consumption :(
the 5970 is not 2 5870 it's more like 2 5850 oced slighty, but your right ud most likley get a simliar result if you oced the 5970 enough.
Discuss things here http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread.php?t=21235
the 5970 is not 2 5870 it's more like 2 5850 oced slighty, but your right ud most likley get a simliar result if you oced the 5970 enough.
Even if I get jammed with evil remarks...
The 5970 IS two 5870s with lower frequencies. The 5850 is stripped down on the hardware level!!!
It would be interesting to see how 5870 cf performs against a 5970 in tessalation.
Quick comparison of the last bench posted by the 5970
GPUs @ stock 850/ 1200
let me know if you want any more rund doing ;)
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9223/5870cfcompare.png
So we gain about 5fps average with 5870 cf over the 5970. Cheers (sas TB).
So we gain about 5fps average with 5870 cf over the 5970. Cheers (sas TB).
2 x 5870 crossfire
Min FPS: 16.1
Max FPS: 99.6
1x 5970 crossfire
Min FPS:27.6
Max FPS:89.1
This is strange! Why these low results with min fps?
Myself and many people have been having a lot of stuttering in this version which is causing the low fps. Hopefully this will be fixed in the next version.
Yeah, I do get stuttering that wasn't evidentin previous releases;
EXTREME Tesseleation for comparison
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/6048/cfmaxxed.png
FPS:28.4
Scores:717
Min FPS:10.6
Max FPS:78.0
And here are mine...
3.8 frames difference... hmmm... I expected the two 5870s to be significantly faster...
Anyway... thanks for your results!
What we need now is the comparison between ATI 'n NVIDIA... Any NVIDIA geeks out there?
Yeah, I do get stuttering that wasn't evidentin previous releases;
EXTREME Tesseleation for comparison
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/6048/cfmaxxed.png
dam impressive max fps on that if i run to 5770's they hit 47max nearly double
D/Ling it now, let's see if I can get this one to run on my system.
Ok, here you go. I had to run it at DX9.0 though as my X700 only supports 9, not 10 or 11. I think my work computer didn't do too badly considering the age of it's components. NO O/C btw, just stock on this run.
http://img267.imageshack.us/img267/2726/79020639.jpg
a pathetic: min - 1.5 fps. max - 21.5
a pathetic: min - 1.5 fps. max - 21.5
It's a very intensive benchmark and I'm sure it's just the GPU you have in your sig holding you back from greater numbers. :D
I was not sure what res to use so I used 1680x1050. Also I get stuttering in this version which I didnt get with the previous unigene version hence the min fps. I apologise if the images are to big.
Snip
http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/8293/uniengine.jpg
Did mine at same settings as you used there for dx11. Interesting that my two 5770s out performed your 5870 which was about £100 more than my cards.
redrooster303
03-08-10, 08:10
i have two 1gb msi cyclone 460's oc edition 725/1900 in sli to do this, with an i7 860. the thing is it doesn't say there in sli but this is how i have them set up. do you think it recognizes the sli or what? should it say sli as it says crossfire? if anyone knows let me know here. +rep if you can help.
here the benchmark:http://a.imageshack.us/img821/8937/unigine8x.png
edit: it must be picking up the sli because as you can see if you go back to page 4 it beats the 5970 at the same values except i'm running at a higher resolution and still beat the 5970. i'm well chuffed with these two in sli, they're alot cheaper and at stock (well oc edition but can get another 30% oc out of them) still beat the 5970 with 5970@1680x1050 and 460 sli@1920x1080. if anyone wants to know they can use this as a bench. its not totally accurate because of the cpu's but its still something to measure from.
well now i can run @ 1080p thought id give this another go
http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j41/NCC1717/00006.jpg
I will also give it a go when I get my new monitor. Hopefully next week.
Here's mine
http://i37.tinypic.com/20fqnfn.jpg
http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/8293/uniengine.jpg
Did mine at same settings as you used there for dx11. Interesting that my two 5770s out performed your 5870 which was about £100 more than my cards.
Yeah they do beat a single 5870 in this benchmark. But I always have the option to crossfire with another 5870 (when prices drop a bit) which is why I choose to spend the extra for a 5870 and not 2 5770's. Two 5770's are great value/performance.
Yeah they do beat a single 5870 in this benchmark. But I always have the option to crossfire with another 5870 (when prices drop a bit) which is why I choose to spend the extra for a 5870 and not 2 5770's. Two 5770's are great value/performance.
damn, they beat my 4890 :mad: ah well, only paid £107 :D
http://i257.photobucket.com/albums/hh212/k3vst3r_oc/00003.jpg
Quick comparison of the last bench posted by the 5970
GPUs @ stock 850/ 1200
let me know if you want any more rund doing ;)
http://img4.imageshack.us/img4/9223/5870cfcompare.png
The above was with my CF 5870s and gelow is my new SLI 460s :)
http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2760/heavencompare.png
lol and with the right res :p
http://img524.imageshack.us/img524/8345/compare2.png
Yeah, I do get stuttering that wasn't evidentin previous releases;
EXTREME Tesseleation for comparison
http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/6048/cfmaxxed.png
Ans again with extreme tesselation
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/424/extremecompare.png
http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/866/heavenbenchoc460.png (http://img832.imageshack.us/i/heavenbenchoc460.png/)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
single gtx 460 768mb running at 868/1736/2051
quite pleased personally, what do you guys think?
Not sure with a single mate, I could disable or take out one of mine and try it on similar settings :D
Tweaked to 875/2010 and CPU @ 4.2:
http://www.upload3r.com/serve/201010/1287560777.png
And Maxxored out @ 1920x1200:
http://www.upload3r.com/serve/201010/1287560830.png
thanks , looking at yours there mine seems about right, just wanted to check the card was within the margins, going to see if i can pick up another shortly, might be some ppl upgrading to new 68XX's and i can pick one up cheap
No probs:
CPU @ 4.2
Single GTX460 @ 868 | 1736 | 2000
http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/4663/singlegtx460.png
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y1/mac124/screenies/unigineresults.png
"default settings @ 1920x1200"
nice score mac, i cant wait to see how the 6000s stack up at this ;)
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/4196/comparearia.png
Cheers marsey :D
TB you running them at the clocks posted in your previous post?
Interesting, my sli setup is running practically the same speed, 875 / 2000.
Do you think the diference in our scores is purely down to the gfx cards (bear in mind mine are also "only" running at x8 due to the limitations of the mobo)?
Well they are diiferent CPUs with a different CPU overclock - also RAM speed and amount of RAM along with number if running processes etc?
One of my cards is at x16 the other at x8 due to the crappy PCIE slot spacings on this board and I want some airflow between the cards :S
Yeah did wonder if the cpus would affect it, both are running 4ghz though so might not affect it that much, dunno if your hyperthreading would help much??
Mines running at 4.2 mate HT enabled :)
Mines running at 4.2 mate HT enabled :)
Oh, looking at your screenies it shows 4Ghz :confused: ???
If it is running 4.2Ghz then it might be helping a bit then i guess.
Yeah, its defo at 4.2 - some benches show the stock clocks, no matter what - I wonder if this is showing x20 (without turbo boost) ?
http://i54.tinypic.com/5tun12.png
Mine seems unusually high compared with some of the other posts in here so far :S
dx10 vs 11 nick i think.
edit
right im going to put some scores in the op but because im lazy and cba sorting thru all the posts to find lots of scores and lots of settings i want them to be either dx10 or 11 and use these settings.
Use the settings below
API: DX10/DX11
Shaders: High
Stereo 3D: disabled
Shaders: High
Tessellation: Normal
Anisotropy: 4
Anti-Aliasing: 8x
Full Screen: YES!
Resolution: 1280x1024
and post your results with your screen like this;
dx =
cpu = xx@xxmhz
gpu =
score =
and if you can put add me as your post title (top of your reply in advanced reply) so it stands out :)
i know its low res and will be cpu limited to some degree but it lets everybody play and you can still show off your high res scores :thumb:
res too, but still a nice score imo :)
dx = 10
cpu = i7 920 D0 @ 4.2 @GHz
gpu = 2xGTX460 @ 875 | 1750 | 1950
score = 2917
http://img28.imageshack.us/img28/8376/ariadx10.png
dx = 11
cpu = i7 920 D0 @ 4.2 @GHz
gpu = 2xGTX460 @ 875 | 1750 | 1950
score = 1895
http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/5193/ariadx11.png
DX = 11
CPU = Phenom II X6 @ 3850Mhz
GPU = 2x 6950 @ 6970 @ 1536 Shader | 875 | 1375
SCORE = 1342
http://www.abload.de/img/setting01by8h.jpg
Using the settings from the OP @ 1920x1080
2500k @ 4.5
460gtx @ 860/1720/2000
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v476/SirTodge/uniengine.jpg
Disapointed to see a 6870 being matched by a 460 - not a great improvement compared to my 5770 on this benchmark.
Nvidia cards will dominate this bench
http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/347/83834510.jpg
http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/3241/11762.png
Added after 12 minutes:
and as OP //////////////////
http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/5140/831op.png
Disapointed to see a 6870 being matched by a 460 - not a great improcement compared to my 5770 on this benchmark
I'm really surprised by that. Could it be the chip holding you back? I've not really been keeping tabs on AMD chips in a long time so honestly I have no idea.
I'll run my bench again just to make sure I had the settings right.
I've just run the heaven test again Bigian88. I made sure my settings matched yours. It got better ><
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v476/SirTodge/heavensecondrun.png
this benchmark heavily favours Nvidia GPU's so if you guys are running on one of them it explains why - my CPU seems to be holding my PC back a fair bit at the moment but i cant do anything about that yet as im waiting for BD
would this be a good benchmark for my 4870? or is it more of a DX11 favoured benchmark?
it supports DX10 too matey
it supports DX10 too matey
cheers :)!
will be downloading this and messing with it tomorrow :)!
just OC'd my 4870 to the max limits in catalyst of 790Mhz core, 1100Mhz memory and only saw a 2.14 average FPS rise in the crysis benchmark, so i want to see if this shows me some better improvements (even though its only a synthetic benchmark and means little :rolleyes:)
it seems CPU doe make a difference to scores, i just turned off the folding@home app and got an extra 4fps.
the benchmark hates ATI/AMD cards :(
I'm tempted to pick up a 6950 and run it as a 6970 before they start stopping the ability to do it. My 460 still sells for £150+ new so I should be able to get something decent for it... hmmmm.
LOL wasn't sure if you meant all the settings mentioned so did them anyway :chairfall:.
This is on msi p67a-gd65 - i5 2500k @4.5ghz - 4gb ddr3 1600 7,8,7,24 - 1 gtx 580.
1280x1024 dx10 --- 1680x1050 dx10 --- 1920x1080 dx10
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/a1280x1024dx10.pnghttp://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/a1680x1050dx10.pnghttp://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/a1920x1080dx10.png
1280x1024 dx11 --- 1680x1050 dx11 --- 1920x1080 dx11
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/b1280x1024dx11.pnghttp://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/b1680x1050dx11.pnghttp://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/b1920x1080dx11.png
dx9 default 1920x1080 --- dx10 default 1920x1080 --- dx11 default 1920x1080
http://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/cdx9default1920x1080.pnghttp://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/cdx10default1920x1080.pnghttp://i433.photobucket.com/albums/qq59/waynio_2008/cdx11default1920x1080.png
Okey Dokey here two I just ran:
1920x1200 8xAA 16xAF:
http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/1729/801max.png
and 1920x1200 8xAA 16xAF EXTREEEEEEME (:P) Tesselation :D
http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/895/635extreme.png
Using the settings from the OP @ 1920x1080
2500k @ 4.5
460gtx @ 860/1720/2000
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v476/SirTodge/uniengine.jpg
Why the low score?
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6017469/Random/Untitwdled.png
I NEED TO OVERCLOCK MORE!!!!! :knock::knock:
Why the low score??:
The only difference I can see between our 1920 runs us thy u ran with 8x aa. Cany you run at that and i'll try without it to compare.
I'm really tempted to get a 6950 for 230. One I sell my gigabyte 460 i'll only need to stump up 120 max.
The only difference I can see between our 1920 runs us thy u ran with 8x aa. Cany you run at that and i'll try without it to compare.
I'm really tempted to get a 6950 for 230. One I sell my gigabyte 460 i'll only need to stump up 120 max.
Just ran the test again after resetting my Nvidia settings. That set my score nearer yours. Evidently I'd set something in the drivers to force a better image that was screwing with the test.
XFX 6850 at 850CC/1050MC
http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k141/MikePaqu/Capture.png
thanks for posting jesus but this thread died as the op went inactive and with so many settings being ok its hard to get apples vs apples scores so i started another here (http://forums.aria.co.uk/showthread.php?t=48041) if you want to see how people stack up :thumb:
rip this thread.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2013 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.