PDA

View Full Version : Crysis "beyond any sensible levels of technology"



coiler
16-10-09, 13:15
Thought this was an interesting comment on Tomshardware RE the 5850 review.

http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/radeon-hd-5850,review-31692-15.html



"Yet it won't be as long as game developers create engines that are capable of outstripping the capabilities of single GPUs pushing the hardcore gamer into multi-GPU setups. But given that GPU manufacturers now have viable multi-GPU technology they will push that hard to sell more cards, thus allowing game developers to keep pushing the upper limits of their engines.

Now if the hardcore gamer stopped buying muti-GPU systems then the above cycle will end, but they won't - either through pride or stupidity the hardcore gamer will say "but to run this at maximum I need 3 GTX-whatevers" and will go and buy them.

In a couple of years single cards WILL be able to play Crysis as you say - there were many similar complaints about Elder Scrolls' requirements when it came out, but it's hardly an issue now - abut frankly I'm tired of people using Crysis as that measuring stick - it's totally unrealistic! Either through optimisim or pure stupidity, the Crytek engine used is just beyond any sensible levels of technology we have at the moment. I thought Doom 3 on Ultra quality was a bad idea when it first came out and then tech caught up, but I'm not sure we'll see that with Crysis any time soon."

marsey99
16-10-09, 14:26
there always will be game "x" thats the yard stick, like it says it was doom 3 then oblivion followed by crysis, still to this day good systems can be brought to their knees by setting crysis on too high a res. there always will be and i think its a good idea for games makers to push the envolope of the capabilities of hardware.

i mean would you of bothered getting this years graphics card or the latest spec of cpu if no software or game could make use of it?

i know i wouldnt, i want to see that the industry is moving forwards, with better eye candy and smarter ai. with more interactive worlds that react in a realisic manner.

to my mind you need a driving force to achieve these things and if it has to be the game makers who take the lead good on them.

k.jacko
16-10-09, 15:12
Wait until next week.........i'm being demo'd their newest engine in production at their HQ. Its a little hush hush, but they're making some very bold claims.
Will report then....if i'm allowed.

alexnifty
16-10-09, 15:15
You'll be NDA'd up the wazoo :P

Games are too focused on graphics anyway. Left 4 Dead showed everyone that you can take what is a modest engine and make a bestseller.

EDIT: And HL2, and portal, and...

coiler
16-10-09, 15:18
I do like some nice graphics though :D

alexnifty
16-10-09, 15:21
Plants vs Zombies

I rest my case :p

k.jacko
16-10-09, 15:25
You'll be NDA'd up the wazoo :P

Lol, i know. If its exciting as they make out, it'll be a killer not braggin about it in here. :knock:

alexnifty
16-10-09, 15:28
Just tell me about it, you can trust me :p

marsey99
16-10-09, 15:29
pm is your friend my man :D

k.jacko
16-10-09, 15:38
:getmecoat: ......to avoid spilling any beans! :redface:

alexnifty
16-10-09, 15:40
Just forward any information and pictures you may have to: alexnifty@alexniftymedia.com thanx!

k.jacko
22-10-09, 15:28
Well...........just been.
and what can i say?...........well nothing as i'm NDA's i'm afraid.
Sorry :(



bloody nice though! :)

alexnifty
22-10-09, 15:37
3hrs of signing NDA's and then 5 minutes of gameplay? :p

k.jacko
22-10-09, 15:43
wasnt the game per se.....but the engine....wow!

alexnifty
22-10-09, 15:46
Haha, probably requires a small serverfarm to run.

k.jacko
22-10-09, 15:54
:w
ho humm

alexnifty
22-10-09, 15:56
Ohh, not falling for it :p