View Full Version : This is why I fit coolers correctly!
Ok for all you people out here, especially the animal type such as MONKEY(s) I think this will just go to show you how you've all been wrong, and how my thermal paste application was BANG ON!
Idle Temperature
http://img340.imageshack.us/img340/9327/57487610.png
LOAD TEMPERATURE (on maximum heat setting)
http://img242.imageshack.us/img242/7218/52787421.png
Any questions? :kick::knock:
I've put full screen screenshots just so you know it's definitely my PC
how do you type with gloves on?
:) you must have you windows open :D
Its an AMD that means the temp sensors will prob be faulty
Did I just say that
*runs off*
:spank
:lol:
You guys aren't bit enough to even muster a sorry in small letters?
Your not clever enough to save those images as GIF files or low quality JPEG's
And no-one was wrong here, you smudged the thermal paste around before placing the cooler on, daft if you ask me.
Shot yourself in the foot here shed
So wait, Is everyone saying that you dont spread the paste and that just a pea in the middle and bang the cooler on is ok?
Have i been doing it wrong?
imo it depends upon the viscosity of the paste and mounting mechanism of the cooler.
thin paste or bolt/screw on cooler and you can squash it, thick paste or push pins and speading can be better.
edit
will i am sorry if you cant tell when im messing with you
imo it depends upon the viscosity of the paste and mounting mechanism of the cooler.
thin paste or bolt/screw on cooler and you can squash it, thick paste or push pins and speading can be better.
edit
will i am sorry if you cant tell when im messing with you
Thats fair man, it's sometimes abit hard to tell that over the internet via letters written on a screen. :D
So wait, Is everyone saying that you dont spread the paste and that just a pea in the middle and bang the cooler on is ok?
Have i been doing it wrong?
No...I just proved that you can do it anyway you like...there really isn't a difference.
Your not clever enough to save those images as GIF files or low quality JPEG's
And no-one was wrong here, you smudged the thermal paste around before placing the cooler on, daft if you ask me.
Shot yourself in the foot here shed
I saved it as .png just because I think its good quality...what does the format have to do with anything :lol: (unless its to do with your slow broadband?)
I was told I'd put too much on, when I said I hadn't and that even if I did the weight of the cooler would have squeezed it out...you can't change the story and tell me that you said I'd smudged it!
Will, i havnt changed any story... i can't even be arsed anymore, your a fool
:rofl: I don't make you comment on everything I post :lol: you just like too
You also always taking stuff soo personally, I wasn't actually talking to you about changing your story :lol: (seeming that you haven't)
Coiler: "The penguin, morning room table (of 70's flower fame), and amount of excess silver 5 which may eventually ooze out and short some components concern me. LOL nice job shed :thumbsup:"
Lynx: "Will, re apply it properly and you will get much better temps.."
Lynx: "Way too much thermal paste.."
Thats who I was talking too me, not you :)
Me: "Its better than a TRUE" PeterStoba "It isn't" Lynx has just got a TRUE and has said they're the same cooling wise, as we've compared temps over MSN.
I think you will find considering we haven't compared ambient, and my paste isn't bedded in, and I have poor airflow, that there isn't conclusive evidence.
And is the AMD app really telling you the correct temps? What does coretemp say?
For your core temp to be 19c your room must be the under 10c if we assume your cooler cools 10c above ambient (which would be impressive).
AMD app does show individual cores at such. +10 degrees gets you real temperatures. Mine was at 18.5 degrees earlier.
mikepardon
03-10-09, 10:20
Your not clever enough to save those images as GIF files or low quality JPEG's
And no-one was wrong here, you smudged the thermal paste around before placing the cooler on, daft if you ask me.
Shot yourself in the foot here shed
PNG's are small file sizes :) Will defo be the next main image format so watch the space. Even Microsoft have the new Windows 7 paint auto applying PNG instead of BMP.
Do you not think it would have caught on before now if it was going to be the next big image filetype? I was working with PNG files 10 years ago at my job, and maybe even longer before that..
mikepardon
03-10-09, 10:52
Maybe you were, but more programs are using this file format now than ever, also, more website browsers didn't support PNG as a standard so it made it quite redundant to use that as the base image format. Now all new browsers can support PNG easily.
Fact is PNG has a reasonably small file size, it can use transparency and has a lossless effect which is something GIF and JPG cannot say to have both.
Maybe you were, but more programs are using this file format now than ever, also, more website browsers didn't support PNG as a standard so it made it quite redundant to use that as the base image format. Now all new browsers can support PNG easily.
Fact is PNG has a reasonably small file size, it can use transparency and has a lossless effect which is something GIF and JPG cannot say to have both.
I just saved 3 different versions of that image in 3 different formats, JPG, GIF. and PNG, all on the highest quality... guess what
JPG=119kb
GIF=196kb
PNG=290
Small file size you say? And i know alot about this sorta stuff so...........
http://a5.vox.com/6a00cdf7ed27ab094f010980c4625d000b-500pi
mikepardon
03-10-09, 11:59
290 is not a large file size :| and quality of PNG's usually have better quality and are ALOT easier to edit compared to jpgs
Not in most cases, cos if your working on something you'll have the original file size, so finding it hard to work with JPEG's is irrelevant
GIF's are the same quality as PNG's with much smaller file sizes, PNG has been around for years like Aaron says, can't see it popular any time soon
Notice: I'm not arguing people, just discussing
Notice: I'm not arguing people, just discussing
Likewise..
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e128/georgekarras/Images/cornholio1.jpg
JPG for the win!
:thumbsdn::thumbsdn::w
And is the AMD app really telling you the correct temps? What does coretemp say?
For your core temp to be 19c your room must be the under 10c if we assume your cooler cools 10c above ambient (which would be impressive).
I've never understood why people don't believe what one program says over another when they read the same sensor :lol:
So obviously they both say around 19C and anyway we're not looking at idle temps it's load temps :D 39C:knock:
Just thought I should say I was funny all 3 120mm fans (including CPU fan) on full so I do have intense airflow....you have to love this case (I want to get some pics to show you this relatively brilliant cable management in such a cheap case).
I've never understood why people don't believe what one program says over another when they read the same sensor :lol:
Because, as far as I know, the sensor doesnt actually report "this chip is running at XXXdegrees/c". It reports the sensor data, which is then interpreted by the programs and produces the reading. When a certain range of the Core2 series came out (I think it was the 45nm version, but it could have been all of them), temperature programs that were 100% dead on for all other chips were massively out - I think they were reporting the chips as being 10-15 degrees COOLER than they actually were - which I'm sure you can see the problem with when it comes to monitoring temps for overclocking etc..
Also, the motherboard manufacturers programs also tend to report 'cooler than actual' temperatures, in my experience. No idea why - I guess it could be marketting or something, but its almost always been the case when compared to a proven reliable programs.
Temperature monitors work to a delta, as in 95 degrees is a zero Reading, anything below. Is a negative value..
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.12 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.